On 6/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not a vendor controlled namespace; it's an individual controlled namespace
Irrelevant.
that I'm more than happy to delegate to the IESG. The IETF has complete change control of the spec at this point -- including changing the XML namespace used by the extension if doing so would be appropriate. I trust the IESG and the RFC editor to do whatever is deemed to be appropriate.
The IESG approved it with no directions to the RFC editor. So your conjecture comes at the wrong juncture. If you were qualified to answer my message, that would be obvious. I'll note that you failed to answer a single question I asked, which tells me they were good ones.
p.s. FUD is generally more effective when not based on generally false and easily refuted assumptions
This is content-free flaming. But I'll note there was nothing false in my message. And you didn't refute anything either. I'd say you're just trying to intimidate people. -- Robert Sayre
