Andreas Sewe wrote:
Well, the subject says it all; here they are:
- It were nice if the example in 7.1 would include @xml:lang, since both
workspace/@title and collection/@title are Language-Sensitive. Granted,
there might be a Content-Language response header (not shown) to do the
job, but IMHO the example would benefit from making language information
explicit.
+1.
Which are clients supposed to respect in a conflict, the
Content-Language header or the xml:lang, ie, does XML On The Web Failing
Miserably, Utterly, And Completely extend to Content-Language+xml:lang?
- The proposed file extension for APP Introspection Documents (.atomsrv)
and its media type (application/atomserv+xml) are inconsistent. It would
IMHO be better to use either "atomsrv" or "atomserv" consistently in
both file extension and media type. Everything else is just confusing
for no good reason.
I have no strong prefs here (other than liking "application/app+xml").
cheers
Bill
