* Alastair Rankine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-17 15:35]: > I thought it might be simpler for the *exporter* to choose > a content syntax - perhaps with the help of the user - which > is deemed to be the most interoperable, and yet closest to the > original.
That is a good counter. However, you still need to address the restriction of text constructs, namely that in Atom, they can be only of type `text` (with no semantics implied for whitespace), `html` or `xhtml`. Without further provisions you can only export the cooked content of elements other than atom:content. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
