There is an unexpected reply located in http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg07722.html.
Quote: <atom:content type="image/svg+xml">...</atom:content> I don't know how to display such a content within a widget, however I know there is some program in the "registry" (Windows Registry, Freedesktop's shared MIME database, OS X configuration, etc.) which is able to open it; so I whot the summary (if any) and provide "Open with..." and "Save as..." buttons. I couldn't do that with an xhtml:object embeded in an <atom:content type="xhtml"/> (or eventually type="html"). It is almost what I want aggregators to do actually. However, web-based aggregators may have difficulties in handling it. Currently, the way to provide alternate format or text... seems to be the followings. For examples: <summary type="xhtml"> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <object type="image/svg+xml" data="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-svg11-v.svg"> <!-- alternate format, alternate text --> <img src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-svg11.png" alt="Valid SVG 1.1" /> </object> </div> </summary> <content type="image/svg+xml" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-svg11-v.svg" /> <summary type="xhtml"> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <object type="application/pdf" data="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/xhtml11.pdf"> <!-- alternate format --> <object type="text/html" data="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/"> <!-- alternate text --> <p>...</p> </object> </object> </div> </summary> <content type="application/pdf" src="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/xhtml11.pdf" /> Anyway, no one can ensure that aggregators will display the summary when they are able to show the content. Also, I would like to repeat again, my examples are not the correct use of summary. If you have any comment, please reply to atom-syntax@imc.org Franklin -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Pagaltzis Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 04:07 To: atom-syntax@imc.org Subject: Re: The "src" attribute of atom:content * Tse Shing Chi (Franklin/Whale) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-20 11:15]: > That's the problem. Since there is no defined fallback > mechanism, the actual mechanism varies from application to > application. Authors of Atom feeds cannot expect what feed > readers will do, and they are not given a chance to provide > alternate content in a different format. I agree, after all the discussion, that this an aspect of Atom that could have been better. I doubt anyone forsaw any need for this at the time. For the time being, you’ll have to make do with using atom:summary as alternative text. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>