2006/11/22, Tse Shing Chi (Franklin/Whale):

There is an unexpected reply located in
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg07722.html.

Oops, sorry!
(double-checked, this time, I answer to atom-syntax ;-) )

Quote:

<atom:content type="image/svg+xml">...</atom:content>
  I don't know how to display such a content within a widget, however
I know there is some program in the "registry" (Windows Registry,
Freedesktop's shared MIME database, OS X configuration, etc.) which is
able to open it; so I whot the summary (if any) and provide "Open
with..." and "Save as..." buttons. I couldn't do that with an
xhtml:object embeded in an <atom:content type="xhtml"/> (or eventually
type="html").

It is almost what I want aggregators to do actually. However, web-based
aggregators may have difficulties in handling it.

They could "display" the summary and provide a "Download the entry
content" link. If they know how to "display" the content, then they
can generate HTML code (an xhtml:object) with fallback to the summary:
<object data="where/is/stored/the/entry/content" type="image/svg+xml">
  <p>If you see this message, it generally means your browser does
not know how to display content of type "image/svg+xml". However, the
entry publisher has provided this summary for you to read:</p>
  <p>...entry's summary...</p>
</object>
<p><a href="where/is/stored/the/entry/content"
hreftype="image/svg+xml">Download the entry content...</a></p>

Currently, the way to provide alternate format or text... seems to be the 
followings.

I personnaly have no problem with a summary acting as an alternate
text (to display if the content can't be): hey, there's a valid reason
why summary must be provided if the content is out-of-line or
base64-encoded ;-)
Alternate "formats" should be linked to using <link rel="alternate"
href="..." />

Anyway, no one can ensure that aggregators will display the summary
when they are [NOT] able to show the content.

Right, but I hope and expect those aggregators to either be updated or
tend to disappear (because people will switch to "better"
aggregators).

--
Thomas Broyer

Reply via email to