I personally just think it's way too early for us to really be able to say much about it. So far the APP implementations that have actually been deployed seem to work rather consistently in that I can get a single client (e.g. Abdera) to work with each with very little effort and only minor variations (e.g. different auth schemes, some require Content-Length on the post, others don't, some reject invalid entries, others don't, etc). Based on my experience thus far, I really don't think it is going to be much of a problem.
- James Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: > [snip] > Am I the only one pondering and worrying about what the different server > implementations will respond to invalid client requests (as, for > example, an invalid Atom document)? How can the client implementors be > interoperable and compatible with each other and every server > implementation if the specification says absolutely nothing about what > to expect when something goes wrong? > [snip]
