On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:50:14 +0100, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] how would people feel about stating in the draft that the server MAY (SHOULD?) reject an Atom entry which would be invalid as per RFC 4287 ?
+1 to "MAY", -1 to "SHOULD".
I think at least a MAY would give some weigh to implementors who wish to be really strict regarding the input the allow.
The "be lenient in what you accept" rule should not apply for APP, imo. If APP implementations get too lenient, the output we get in the other end will be even more lenient. Crap in, crap out, basically. So +1.
-- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
