Robert Sayre wrote: > > On 11/28/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> 3. We define a new media type for Atom Entry Documents, >> e.g. application/atomentry+xml > > No one relies on Atom Entry alternates now, so this is the best > option. We should tack it onto the APP draft, since that will solve > issues with the accept element there. And praise to mnot, who > suggested we do this in RFC4287 but was overruled by the WG (including > myself). >
+1 very much on a new media type. The confusion carried by the current one is alarming now but will become a real issue if APP does take off. - Sylvain
