I'm fine either way. Wouldn't take that long for me to write up a draft. - James
Tim Bray wrote: > On Nov 29, 2006, at 8:16 AM, James M Snell wrote: > >> http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceEntryMediatype >> >> #pragma section-numbers off >> >> == Abstract == >> >> For the current Atom Publishing Protocol draft... > > Irrespective of the merits of the new media type, the APP spec seems > like the wrong place to define it. Since nobody wants to obsolete 4287, > why not a short clean standalone I-D? -Tim > >
