On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:44 PM, James M Snell wrote:
I certainly hope you're kidding about dropping entry docs.
Sure, yes. But your wording IMHO seemed to imply that what feed
readers do should guide a decision. So, given they are not interested
in the entries, dropping them is not too farfetched, is it?
Let's just
label 'em differently and move on.
I still do not see the use cases justifying a new media type - it
might be the right thing to do but for the time being it looks like a
workaround.
Jan
- James
Jan Algermissen wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:30 PM, James M Snell wrote:
Jan Algermissen wrote:
[snip]
So they should be fixed, should they not? They seem to only have
implemented half a media type.
The half they're interested in. Why aren't they interested in
the other
half?
Ha! Forget about the media type - let's drop entry documents.
Jan
- James
