Hi Mark,
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
On 1/4/07, Jan Algermissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recall Mark Baker using something similar in his former RDF
Forms draft:
<rf:Container xmlns:rf="http://www.markbaker.ca/2003/rdfforms/";
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
rdf:about="http://shoes.example.com/order-processor/";>
<rf:acceptedMediaType>application/xml</rf:acceptedMediaType>
<rf:acceptedNamespace rdf:resource="http://shoe-
standards.example.org/orders/shoes/"/> <<============
<rf:intent rdf:resource="http://shoe-standards.example.org/order-
shoes/"/>
</rf:Container>
That just describes an expectation ala app:accept, rather than any
inline content ala the type attribute on atom:content.
Sure. Sorry if you feel misrepresented. I only meant to provide an
example of how one addressed the lack of distinguished MIME types for
some formats by using the formats namespace instead.
Jan
Mark.
--
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
