It is not year clear if there has been enough independent implementation of the specification to justify publishing it as a proposed standard.
- James Franklin Tse wrote: > James, > > Why are you going to recommend that for publication as an experimental or > informational draft, but not a Proposed Standard? > > Franklin Tse > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "atom-syntax" <atom-syntax@imc.org>; "atom-protocol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 00:59 > Subject: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal Last Call > >> I have posted an updated version of the Atom Bidi Draft. The only >> significant difference is a notice about direction guess algorithms. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-bidi-03.txt >> >> I have implemented support for this specification in Abdera and in IBM's >> updated internal blogging environment. >> >> The specification adds a new attribute "dir" to the set of common >> attribute attributes within the Atom namespace. The dir attribute >> specifies the default directionality of language-sensitive text within >> an Atom document. >> >> example, >> >> <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; dir="rtl"> >> ... >> </entry> >> >> At this point, I intend to request a formal last call on the document >> and recommend it for publication as an experimental or informational draft. >> >> Feedback is requested. >> >> - James >> >> >
