Yeah, I know, but I personally have a preference towards having more implementations available... especially since we're talking about a draft that updates the core Atom spec with a new attribute.
- James Martin Duerst wrote: > At 02:25 07/03/23, James M Snell wrote: >> It is not year clear if there has been enough independent implementation >> of the specification to justify publishing it as a proposed standard. > > There is no need for implementations when going to Proposed Standard > (of course, they never hurt). There is a well-defined need when going > from Proposed Standard to Draft Standard, but that's way in the future. > > Regards, Martin. > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
