On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:06:53AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Other than personal preference, is there a reason Screen is needed > rather than tmux? >
Not at all. Others have mentioned that some debugging tools haven't made the switch yet. Ignoring that, I'd agree that tmux--being more modern---makes more sense. > Note - we are currently shipping Fedora with a bunch of packages that > > are really unnecessary in practice for anyone using > Atomic as it's meant > to be used. Short term, > this is OK b/c most people using Atomic are > > doing so as you are -- long term, that's a severely broken practice. > Yes and no. Sure Atomic's main use will be as cloud host, but why not develop your containers on the host you'll ultimately be using? Plus Atomic is a very good *as an OS* full stop. I actually prefer virtualizing and working with Atomic to the other minimal OS's or even real Fedora. I don't think I'll be alone in this, especially when you consider the "I use OSX and virtualize Linux" crowd. Once you embrace the "everything in a container" model of Atomic, it's a really good experience in and of itself. _Trevor -- Sent from my Amiga 500. (Trevor Jay) Red Hat Product Security gpg-key: https://ssl.montrose.is/chat/gpg-key
