On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > The main reason is size - if you're deploying quite a lot of the images, > size does start to matter. We should have an Atomic host that's as small > as possible. > > That doesn't rule out a separate build for developers or whatever that > uses Atomic/rpm-ostree, but I strongly feel we should have an Atomic > Host image that's as small as possible with the idea that users are > never directly SSH'ing into the image.* > > (* Barring troubleshooting.)
I agree, however at the moment we need screen for a variety of reasons... Please see my first mail on this subject: https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2015-April/msg00044.html Once there is an atomic+devel image, that would be a different story. Thanks, James
