On 04/22/2015 05:22 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I agree as stated in my first post being able to develop on atomic > is something I have wanted myself. Screen itself okay, but how many > more packages are needed to truly develop on atomic like the post I > responded to indicated, so in turn I gave up what would have been a +1 > from me. > > “Yes and no. Sure Atomic's main use will be as cloud host, but why not > develop your containers on the host you'll ultimately be using? Plus > Atomic is a very good *as an OS* full stop. I actually prefer > virtualizing and working with Atomic to the other minimal OS's or even > real Fedora. I don't think I'll be alone in this, especially when you > consider the "I use OSX and virtualize Linux" crowd. Once you embrace > the "everything in a container" model of Atomic, it's a really good > experience in and of itself.
This quote should be a short blog at ProjectAtomic. I love it.
