I have a lot to say from my previous community building experiences about one identity regarding visuals and messaging - I'll not go into further discussions on this thread but rather have a separate one at another time.
Here is the Twitter vote regarding the logo for those who haven't seen it already: https://twitter.com/projectatomic/status/965693089179488256 Please vote on the Twitter poll - if you don't have a Twitter account, vote via this e-mail thread. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:33:38AM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote: > > >> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later > point > > >> in the future in case we want to introduce FAH and FAW logos (unless > > > FWIW the current Fedora Atomic Host logo we're using (at least on the > > > download page) is > > > https://getfedora.org/static/images/atomic-head-logo.png > > It seems appropriate to vote on the Project Atomic logo on this ML, > > but the Fedora Atomic things should go through Fedora processes. Maybe > > one of the monday atomic community meetings would be the best place to > > discuss this, vs one of the wed meetings, which are about feodra. > > Yeah, I just want to make sure they tie together. > > > > It's always been a bit confusing, but Project Atomic proper was > > explicitly chartered *not* to distribute an OS, for reasons I don't > > think I ever fully understood. But it's always been the Fedora and > > I think it was, pretty much: we already have three operating systems in > the family, and splitting things further was (and is) the wrong > direction. > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader >
