On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:33:14PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> >>Just wondered who I have to bribe^H^H^H^H^Hconvince to get NTFS and 
> >>Software Suspend included in the ATrpms repo? :-)
> >>
> >>In fact NTFS is not much of a problem because the site delivers a large 
> >>amount of precompiled rpms for all(?) the official kernels but being 
> >>able to just install it with a simpel apt-get/smart install command 
> >>would be great.
> >>
> >>The software suspend (http://mhensler.de/swsusp/index_en.php) is what 
> >>gives me the most "problems", I'm running FC3 on a laptop and the 
> >>suspend to ram works but I really want suspend to disk. Software Suspend 
> >>seems to have what it takes and they have a lot of ready-tu-use kernels 
> >>but of course the moment I install one of those I lose all ATrpms 
> >>goodness (like the nvidia kernel modules).
> >>
> >>So.... any chance that any of this might be included some time?
> >>And if so, is there any help that I could give to make it happen (sooner)?
> >
> >ntfs may be supported soon, it's quite easy to add the kmdls. software
> >suspend is a different beast. It requires a separate kernel (not a
> >kmdl) and last time I tried (1-2 years?) it was just eating my
> >PC.
> >
> >I wouldn't mind a special myth kernel as Mark suggested that would
> >have such features in. But I think it will be quite an effort to work
> >on this.

> Ok, it has been a while but in the last couple of days I've been trying 
> out Matthias Hensler's kernels that include software suspend 
> (http://mhensler.de/swsusp/index_en.php) and they work perfectly for me.
> 
> So... maybe I could convince you to take another look at software 
> suspend support for the AT kernel? :-D
> 
> The information on the site is quite extensive and there are all kinds 
> of ready-to-install rpms and such so hopefully it wouldn't be too much 
> work for you to include it into ATrpms.

Well, "jam with the best", I Cced Matthias, maybe he would be
interested in maintaining kernel and other related patched packages
within ATrpms. I think that would be the best configuration.

Matthias, would that be something you'd like to do?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpwfJvef2hVP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to