On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:35:15AM -0500, Phil Schaffner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:21 -0600, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Hm, needs some thinking. First of all thanks a lot for the report, and > > for your trust in running only suspend2 kernels :) > > Wasn't so much trust as debugging the problem I reported on this list > Feb. 21 with yum-plugin-kmdl. You pointed me to > > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1132 > > and in retrospect, it seems this problem could be related. Could it be > that the plugin did not offer the suspend2 kmdls because it did not see > kernel in the provides?
No, the plugin does not look at provides it just checks on the packages' name. > > Could you please cut and paste the relevant findings of the bug to > > bugzilla.atrpms.net? I'll get Matthias on the Cc and we'll hopefully > > find some better solution. Thanks! > > Will do. > > Best regards, > Phil > > > > _______________________________________________ > atrpms-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpg7QvvqAH0v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
