On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 22:42 +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > Hm, needs some thinking. First of all thanks a lot for the report, and > > for your trust in running only suspend2 kernels :) > > > Running without non-suspend kernels for a long time now and never any > problems, but I do remember that several times after an update I would > have a kernel package again which I would then remove.
May only bite you with the 2.6.19 FC6 kernel-suspend2. Forgot to post the BZ entry on this. See that for the latest details. http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1138 Phil _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
