On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 21:54 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 03:33:15PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote: > > i just read about the build issues that prevented the alsa-kmdls from > > being built for the new kernel. > > > > i also noticed that the zaptel-kmdls are available for 1.2, but not 1.4. > > > > by chance, were there issues with that one too? thanks axel. > > Yes, everything that existed for the 2.6.19 kernels and hasn't yet > appeared on the repo for 2.6.20 is due to not building on latter > anymore. For alsa Reza Naima gave the fix (thanks again) and the > packages are on their way, all the rest need some love, too. The > failure for zaptel, which I see it for a couple of weeks on F7's > kernels, too, is: > And it appears a few days ago s/o filed an upstream bug report with > the resolution of waiting for zaptel 1.4.1. > > http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9283 > > If s/o wants to extract the required patch, I'd be very thankful!
thanks axel. in your experience, how long does digium take to make new releases? also, perhaps someone might know... if the zaptel drivers are released under the gpl, why are they not part of the kernel? is that something that would be up to digium to request it for kernel inclusion? (i am not familiar with how that process works.) -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
