On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 23:43 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 09:54:52PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 03:33:15PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote: > > > i also noticed that the zaptel-kmdls are available for 1.2, but not 1.4. > > Yes, everything that existed for the 2.6.19 kernels and hasn't yet > > appeared on the repo for 2.6.20 is due to not building on latter > > anymore. For alsa Reza Naima gave the fix (thanks again) and the > > packages are on their way, all the rest need some love, too. The > > failure for zaptel, which I see it for a couple of weeks on F7's > > kernels, too, is: > > Workaround: > > Use latest zaptel 1.2 and add some symlinks from > /usr/include/zaptel/zaptel.h to /usr/include/linux/zaptel.h >
thanks for the information. also, i was just browsing the changelogs for the zaptel modules and noticed that you [Tzafrir Cohen] are doing lots of work, so thank you for that as well! i am new to using zaptel modules and since it seems from browsing the sources that versions 1.2 and 1.4 are both actively maintained, does one succeed the other? and why would a person choose one over the other? if it makes any difference, i use a tdm400p. -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
