Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > Regarding fuse, it wasn't clear to me from Brian's response what one > loses (or gains) by using the built-in kernel fuse support. I.e., is > there any reason to have fuse-kmdl at all if fuse support is built > into the kernel (other than perhaps a more bleeding edge version)? > > Note that I already have the regular Fedora fuse rpm installed and > have until now also been installing the atrpms fuse kmdls. I believe > that I mostly only use fuse now for the ntfs driver.
FWIW, I haven't used the ATRPMs fuse modules for quite some time now with no ill effects. I use it only to access a local NTFS partition and it works fine. As you note, you may want the kmdls for more sophisticated usage or to fix a specific problem but if you haven't seen a problem, it's likely you would be fine with the Fedora-supplied driver. I also exclude them in atrpms.repo for simplicity... -- Jeff Guerdat Is it any wonder that we have a show called "Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader" and a President who isn't? Alan Shore in "Boston Legal" _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
