On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 04:38:15PM -0700, Mark Goldberg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 09:04:57AM -0700, Mark Goldberg wrote:
> >> On Oct 3, 2009, 12:07 AM Axel Thimm wrote:
> >>
> >> >I'll be respinning packages for 0.21 and 0.22 over the WE. But I think
> >> >there will always be interesting bits from trunk (0.23 to come) to use
> >> >in bijou.
> >>
> >> I noticed that for F10 mythtv-0.21-212_bijou20090831 appeared and then
> >> went away,
> >> with only the source rpm left. I did not install it, as I take the
> >> source rpm and build
> >> a custom set of rpms from it with a few changed patches.
> >>
> >> Is there an issue still? Should I attempt to build it or wait?
> >
> > It is still the same package, e.g. the issues from 20090831 still apply.
> >
> 
> Is there going to be an update to 0.21 or is it probably best to just wait 
> till
> 0.22 is actually released? I know JYA has stopped backporting patches
> and he has encouraged me to go to trunk, but I don't want to destroy the
> WAF. It looked to me from the above posting that you and Yeechang Lee
> were able to update 0.21 bijou.

The above posting was from a thread where I was encouraging Yeechang
Lee to keep the bijou flavour of mythtv even for 0.22 and later. I'm
sure Jean and Yeechang will find that there are patches floting around
or stuff in 0.23 that they'd like to have in 0.22-fixes and will
create patchsets for their personal use with part of the community
begging them to share :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpiiTZwJob2X.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to