On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 19:58 +0200, linux.il wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:47 +0200, linux.il wrote: >> >> I'm looking for recent ffmpeg for CENTOS5. I downloaded and >> >> installed the latest ffmpeg-0.6-36_git20101002.el5, but it provides >> >> only 25305. How frequently ATRPMS provides new revisions? For >> >> example, is there any chance to see revision >= 25512 soon? >> > >> > Sure, if someone asks as nicely as you do. :) >> > >> > BTW what is special about >= 25512? >> > -- >> >> Thank you for your prompt answer. And yes, I'll ask nicely :-) >> As for magic 25512: we have a few clips which our current ffmpeg >> (some revision from Apr, 2009) fails to render. After some research >> [on MS Windows] we discovered that rev 25512 knows to render these >> clips. > > OK, new ffmpeg builds are up. > >> OTOH, I noticed just now, that you stopped to build RPMs for RHEL4, >> and we're still runnning it. So it seems that I'll need to build >> ffmpeg by myself anyway... > > I didn't stop, ffmpeg did. ;) > > ffmpeg >= 0.6 wouldn't build for RHEL4 anymore, there is even an issue > raised at ffmpeg, but it won't be fixed. You need to upgrade make for > building on RHEL4. As this doesn't create any problems I upgraded make > on my buildsystems and there comes ffmpeg 0.6 for RHEL4 and clones! :) > (0.5.x for RHEL4 was always available, but probably not working for your > clips)
Thank you again. In fact, I already built recent ffmpeg for RHEL4 [yes, I upgraded make to 3.81]. _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
