On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:54 AM, gmhwxi <[email protected]> wrote: > If an at-view T@l for a pointer ptr(l) can be found, the system assumes > that the pointer is not NULL. You may use a run-time check to solve this > issue (or use optional views).
I think I understand it, now. > My concern with this style is that it is still very verbose in practice. Yes... you are right... -- Kiwamu Okabe at METASEPI DESIGN -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/CAEvX6dkZzUzjKr_fR3a%2BSA4SCEQ-2ojFs0j4RBSyjJXPsNw%3Dzw%40mail.gmail.com.
