On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:02 PM, gmhwxi <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you need to try it on a realistic example in order to get a sense > as to how it works in practice. My suspicion is that the at-view style may > not be adequate for a "complex" struct. I would go with the aptr-style, > which > allows you to take advantage of the support for overloading in ATS.
Yes. Thanks for careful advice. But I can easily choose the style, because I re-choose it by changing c2ats utility the other day. Easy come, easy go. Thanks, -- Kiwamu Okabe at METASEPI DESIGN -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/CAEvX6d%3DO30y4roGpsvFYQ_xwb5fSu%2BF%3DRr-wSQeFTLPbvbtgkw%40mail.gmail.com.
