I thinks it all depends...
What kind of records do you have in mind?
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 7:37:38 AM UTC-4, Kiwamu Okabe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Kiwamu Okabe <...> wrote:
> > By the way, the "aPtr1 style" code is more large than "at-view style"
> code:
> >
> > $ wc -l mutual_struct{2,3}/main.dats
> > 44 mutual_struct2/main.dats
> > 53 mutual_struct3/main.dats
>
> Ah, "at-view style" code grows more large, if support `opt`.
> I think I agree your "aPtr1 style" code has good balance.
>
> By the way, I have another question. If we support ATS's record such
> like no-mutual but including pointer, we should also choose same
> method as supporting struct?
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Kiwamu Okabe at METASEPI DESIGN
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ats-lang-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/a60df044-24d0-4704-bf10-f629da8922ef%40googlegroups.com.
