Dear Artyom and Hongwei, thanks for your kind reply. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:51 PM Artyom Shalkhakov <artyom.shalkha...@gmail.com> wrote: > The "state types" are described here: > > http://www.ats-lang.org/MYDATA/Xanadu-lics00.pdf > > section 4.3. The section talks about synthesizing these state types. I guess > that ATS2 and ATS3 still follow a similar approach (since sometimes it's OK > to drop the annotations completely and sometimes not). > > I can't source my claim about performance though, sorry about that.
Thanks. I should read the detail... BTW, I can fix this issue with `let in end` style code without `l2:addr` static value: https://github.com/metasepi/uemacs-bohai/commit/9d52514601151fb0887a436f2e1680be09b0cddd I think it means: A. `value where {}` style code needs `l2:addr` static value B. `let in` style code needs no `l2:addr` static value I believe both styles are equivalent. Are there some difference on type inference? > Hongwei I love A style, but I should choose B if it has better inference. Best regards, -- Kiwamu Okabe at METASEPI DESIGN -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ats-lang-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/CAEvX6d%3DuiDnjxOPG9C7a2QMB25QPrBRMYxQ7iJdC-6SSf5krGQ%40mail.gmail.com.
