On Fri, Apr 22 2005, Reiner Steib wrote:
> ,----[ M-x apropos-variable RET font-latex.*fontify RET ]
> | font-latex-fontify-script
> | Variable: If non-nil, fontify subscript and superscript strings.
> | font-latex-title-fontify
> | Variable: Whether to fontify LaTeX titles with varying height [...]
> `----
>
> It would be nice if both options would be named font-latex-fontify-*
> or font-latex-*-fontify. I'd prefer the former, not only because we
> had a misspelling of `font-latex-title-fontify' upto 11.54, so
> `font-latex-title-fontify' only appeared in a single release.
I don't know why Peter used the word "title" in this variable and
faces. "section" would be more appropriate, I think. Ralf recently
changed[1] the doc string for the faces to "Face for sectioning
commands at level %s" (from "Face for LaTeX titles at level %s."). I
agree to that change and additionally propose to rename
`font-latex-title-fontify' to `font-latex-fontify-section' and
`font-latex-title-N-face' to `font-latex-section-N-face'.
Opinions? Objection?
Bye, Reiner.
[1] In revision 5.107. BTW: `font-latex-title-5-face' still has the
old doc string.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
