On Wed, Apr 27 2005, David Kastrup wrote:
> Nitpickingly, it might be something more like "sectioning" or "section
> heading", since the section is what comes behind it.
>
> We have also texinfo-heading-face (from outside of AUCTeX) and
> LaTeX-section-heading (a function).
[...]
> I think "heading" might be more appropriate.
texinfo has @heading (and @subheading, ...) commands beside @*section.
"sectioning" seems more appropriate to me for `font-latex.el' than
"heading".
On Wed, Apr 27 2005, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> I'd use "sectioning" instead of "section" in order to make it clearer
> that not only the \section level is affected but sectioning commands
> in general.
"sectioning" or "heading" (David's suggestion) are fine with me. I'd
prefer "sectioning".
> We should define aliases if possible. I don't want to exasperate all
> the people who customized `font-latex-title-*-face'. This should
> work:
> (put 'font-latex-title-*-face 'face-alias 'font-latex-sectioning-*-face)
As we have additional -0 and -5 faces, is it worth to pretend full
compatibility? Probably most users won't need to customize those
anyhow and should be using `font-latex-title-fontify' instead.
>> [1] In revision 5.107. BTW: `font-latex-title-5-face' still has the
>> old doc string.
>
> While you are at it ... (c;
Sure. :-)
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
