Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2005-05-09) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> * David Kastrup (2005-05-09) writes: >>> >>>> After thinking this over, I have decided that the sanest course is >>>> to release "standalone" versions of preview-latex with the version >>>> numbers from AUCTeX. It makes clear what versions belong together >>>> and are more up-to-date than whatever else. It also means that >>>> version 0.9.2 will not be released at all, but rather be 11.80. > [...] >>> If you don't provide tarballs, what exactly is a "standalone" >>> release of preview-latex then? >> >> Who is talking about standalone releases? > > Uh, you?
Well, I did not really mean to. At least now I think I did not mean to... > At least that's how I understood the phrase Âto release "standalone" > versions of preview-latex in the paragraph quoted above. Well, the quotation marks were intended to imply that this is not really a standalone version. It may be, however, that at the time I wrote this I had only planned on using the same version numbers, and then later noticed that releasing separate tarballs would probably be not useful, either. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
