David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If nobody has an objection, I'll check it in.
Done. Of course at the time I wrote this nobody had an objection (yet), so in the strict sense of the word I have not been lying. It is all for the best. Or something. > Even though it is late in the run, the old code does not make sense. > And I am afraid that I still have more invasive stuff to finish in > preview-latex, so there will have to be more testing, anyway. Not to mention that I still have to reorganize the installation to a state where one can package the whole caboodle into a consistent state for RPMs and or XEmacs, and write recommendations for packagers. Sigh. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
