David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's not unheard of. Not uncommonly, we have something like
>
> (if (fboundp 'completing-read-multiple)
> (defalias 'TeX-completing-read-multiple 'completing-read-multiple)
> (defun TeX-completing-read-multiple [the definition stolen straight from
> Emacs] ...
> )
The definition from Emacs would be all of crm.el.
Would it be safe to
1. Copy crm.el from Emacs into tex-crm.el in AUCTeX
2. Remove autoload cookies from tex-crm.el
3. Do
(load "crm" t t)
(unless (featurep 'crm)
(require 'tex-crm.el))
4. Then just use `completing-read-multiple'
It is a lot simpler than renaming all symbols in crm.el (especially if
we have to follow updates in crm.el).
Kind regards,
/arne
--
Arne Jørgensen <http://arnested.dk/>
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
