Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Arne Jørgensen (2005-10-11) writes: > >> The definition from Emacs would be all of crm.el. >> >> Would it be safe to >> >> 1. Copy crm.el from Emacs into tex-crm.el in AUCTeX > > I don't like such practice. If we go further down this lane we might > end up shipping AUCTeX with half of GNU Emacs included and trying to > constantly catch up with it. > > In the case at hand I'd either use a similar (but functionally > inferior) function provided by XEmacs like `completing-read' or > would not provide completion at all. Optionally upon hitting TAB in > the minibuffer a message could be shown that the user should think > about upgrading to GNU Emacs.
That's a bit heavy-handed, I guess. I think something carelessly modeled around "completing-read" should do the trick. And of course, we should add this to the list of things why to prefer Emacs with AUCTeX. I think it belongs in the FAQ. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
