* Arne Jørgensen (2005-10-11) writes: > Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I think we should provide an option to get the current behavior back. >> Things like these might be in the finger-memory of users. > > I've made a variable `LaTeX-usepackage-intelligent-behavior-p' that > will give the old behavior if set to nil.
In my opinion this is unnecessary. If we think the new behavior is favorable let's just do that and don't look back to the old one which I always found awkward. By the way, coding conventions suggest to use a `-p' suffix for functions but a `-flag' suffix for variables concerning true-or-false conditions, see (info "(elisp)Coding Conventions"). I don't think we are consistent throughout AUCTeX's code base, but this could change over time. (c: > + (if (null LaTeX-usepackage-intelligent-behaviour-p) That should be `not' instead of `null' for clarity. `null' is normally used if the object to be checked is considered a list, see (info "(elisp)List-related Predicates"). -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
