* David Kastrup (2006-02-07) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> (TeX-command-list): Use `TeX-run-function' instead of >> `TeX-run-ispell-on-document' for "Spell" option. Remove >> `TeX-run-ispell-on-document' as option for the third element of an >> item. >> (TeX-ispell-document): Move here from tex-buf.el. > > Things like "TeX-run-ispell-on-document" should be kept as aliases for > the sake of older customizations.
An alias doesn't make much sense because `TeX-run-function' does something completely different. If you are concerned about people who customized `TeX-command-list' and therefore have a `TeX-run-ispell-on-document' entry, we'd have to keep the whole function definition. Hmmm, I guess users with customized `TeX-command-list' variables will probably prefer to miss functionality in contrast to getting an error, so I'll put the definition back in. > Anyway, why use a string here as argument for TeX-run-function? Seems > ugly, when actually a list is used. Because it's pumped through `TeX-command-expand'. By using a string we don't have to check for the variable's type in `TeX-command'. And because that way we don't have to insert a choice in the defcustom for `TeX-command-list'. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
