On Wed, May 31 2006, David Kastrup wrote:

> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ,----[ CHANGES ]
>> |    * The LaTeX tool bar is now enabled by default.  See *Note Running
>> |      TeX and friends::.
>> `----
>
> But the latter makes no sense in plain text.  

IMHO it's better then no reference at all in the plain text output.
We do the same in No Gnus for GNUS-NEWS[1] since more than 2 years and
no user complained.  So it seems the users understand that these are
references to the manual(s) or they don't read GNUS-NEWS. ;-)

> We don't want junk in CHANGES.  So I still maintain that no-validate
> seems like a bad idea, since it stops us from seeing problems.

I don't see that --no-validate stops us from seeing problems, because
we will see problems (if any) when creating the info files.

But as we seem to disagree, I will add "@ifclear rawfile" as you
suggested and remove --no-validate.

Bye, Reiner.

Footnotes: 
[1]  GNUS-NEWS is created from texi/gnus-news.texi which corresponds
     to the node (info "(gnus)No Gnus") in the manual.

-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/



_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel

Reply via email to