On Wed, May 31 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thanks. As you can see in this (and other files), there has been
> quite a bit of work invested for keeping these sort of unspecified
> cross references out of the plain text versions. It would not make
> sense to change this practice for a single new note without a
> previous discussion, even if I happened to be alone with my opinion.
Sorry for not discussing it here: When adding the @ref in changes.texi
I wasn't aware of the problem for CHANGES. Just now, I noticed that
there are already other @xref-s with @ifclear there. And yesterday
evening, I wanted to finish the RPM stuff.
In general, I think it's useful to have cross-references (wrapped in
"@ifclear rawfile") from (info "(auctex)Changes") to other parts of
the manual.
BTW, I tried to find the new `TeX-doc' and `TeX-clean' using `i clean'
and `i doc' unsuccessfully. Maybe we should add something to
`auctex.texi'?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
