Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 02 2006, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I need the final auctex-11.83.tar.gz to build the RPM (or am I missing >>> something? Yes, of course I can build straight from the spec file, but >>> IIRC we wanted to avoid this.), so I'd rather wait for Ralf to upload >>> it. >> >> You can create the final tarball yourself, if you want. > > I know, but I wanted to make sure the plain-tgz and the tgz in the > SRPM are the identical.
That's what I meant with "final tarball". > I agree that it's worth to fix the doc issues pointed out by Ralf. > (Okay, I just see on auctex-diffs that Ralf already did, so you can > probably disregard my previous mail on that.) There's another minor > doc issue: In the DVI/PDF file, the paragraph "Making the Elisp > available" has a very bad underfull hbox. Maybe someone has an idea > how to fix it. Reword the paragraph in question until it is fine. English often provides opportunity for deleting "the" or "a" or "which" without changing meaning. > As Ralf doesn't seem to be able to make an Emacs+AUCTeX snapshot for > windows in time for 11.83, I'd suggest to remove the release tag > from CVS again and remove the corresponding ChangeLog entries > (David?). Then (when back to a broadband connection: today in the > evening or tomorrow) I'll create all the release files consistently > (tgz, zip, xemacs-package, rpm) using the Makefile targets. Go ahead. I undid release tags and ChangeLog entry. > Then I'll make the files available² to David for a final QA and do > some last tests of the rpm file. If everything is okay, one of us > would upload the stuff to gnu.org and David sends out the > announcements (and does the CTAN upload). > > Bye, Reiner. > > ¹ I offered to create the xemacs-package (it works straight forward), > but I can't (or don't like to) test it (I'd never looked at how to > install packages within XEmacs). You unzip straight into a suitable package tree (can be ~/.xemacs-packages usually). That's all there is to it. > ² On my webspace or on fencepost. Any preference? Mail or fencepost. I don't want files with the official file names flying around on the web until we have decided to actually release them. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
