On Thu, Sep 14 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> `TeX-record-buffer' is supposed to express the user's preference (in
>> fact, I will make it customizable before committing it) as also Emacs
>> users might prefer recording the buffers. I thought using (featurep
>> 'xemacs) as default might be slightly better than nil, because in
>> XEmacs `TeX-pop-to-buffer' always behaves as if `TeX-record-buffer' is
>> t. (But I don't have a strong opinion on this.)
>
> Why define it in the first place if XEmacs will ignore it?
Either you missed the part "Emacs users might prefer recording the
buffers" or I don't understand your question.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
