On Tue, Jun 26 2007, Reiner Steib wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> A similar issue in Gnus reminded me of this uncommitted patch.
And now, I searched for uncommitted patches to test the filters on the
commit lists. ;-)
>> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Thu, Sep 14 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> `TeX-record-buffer' is supposed to express the user's preference (in
>>>>> fact, I will make it customizable before committing it) as also Emacs
>>>>> users might prefer recording the buffers. I thought using (featurep
>>>>> 'xemacs) as default might be slightly better than nil, because in
>>>>> XEmacs `TeX-pop-to-buffer' always behaves as if `TeX-record-buffer' is
>>>>> t. (But I don't have a strong opinion on this.)
>>>>
>>>> Why define it in the first place if XEmacs will ignore it?
[...]
>> I don't see a point in
>> (defcustom ignoredvariable (featurep 'xemacs) ...
>> instead of
>> (unless (featurep 'xemacs)
>> (defcustom ignoredvariable ...
>
> Probably I thought that Emacs can't locate the defcustom then. But it
> does. How about the attached patch?
Committed.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
