"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank, > > yes, I knew from the developers' list. I will be able to work on it > next week. We're going to have a problem, though, the same old problem > of the new DFSG interpretation WRT the GNU FDL. David will release the > manual for 11.54 under the GNU FDL
That will mean that I will no longer contribute to AUCTeX documentation. Bad enough that I have signed the paperwork and cannot prevent my old texts from being incorporated in a document under a misdrafted license. > and he will probably have to add > front and back covers (as per GNU Maintainer Guidelines), though no > invariant sections. Front and back covers are invariant; however that doesn't matter for my decision. > At this moment > David is talking to RMS to try and have an exception (i.e., pure GNU FDL > without front and back cover, no invariant sections). I was under the impression that if a manual was under GPL, it could stay, and need not be relicensed. Anybody on the auctex developers' list feeling like forking from the last GPL'ed manual? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
