On Sun, Oct 01 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I assumed that the problems where known to the team (I didn't have
>> time to follow the list in the last months), and therefore just
>> wanted to ask whether the bad feelings about the GFDL are general
>> enough to do something about that as a team. Now I got the
>> impression that you haven't discussed the license so far, and Ralf's
>> mail seems to imply that there's interest in doing that.
FWIW, I don't have bad feelings about the GFDL, but I do have strong
bad feelings when someone starts to talk about "forking the manual".
> If there was consensus on the list that I am not doing a good job as a
> GNU project maintainer, or that AUCTeX should try to cease being a GNU
> project, I would be willing to pass the buck of maintenance to anybody
> with the majority of support of the list members, as long as he can
> guarantee all the infrastructure and support AUCTeX needs to continue.
[...]
I support your position. I want AUCTeX do be a GNU project and I hope
we will be able to include it in Emacs some day.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
