> Cc: [email protected], > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [email protected] > From: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:47:55 +0100 > > On Dec 30, 2006, at 16:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > But you might need to do that anyway, since some Emacs features used > > by RefTeX will require a newer Emacs. > > > > Besides, why not couple them? What's the problem? > > RefTeX has always had a life outside the Emacs CVS repository, > to make it run with XEmacs and with non-CVS emacs. It is > still fully compatible with Emacs 21, and it caters for XEmacs > as well. > There are many people who use RefTeX but still use Emacs 21, > and even after the 22 release, this will be true for quite a > while.
Ralf said Emacs release cycle is too slow, but now you say that there are many RefTeX users that still use Emacs 21. This sounds like a contradiction to me. Anyway, I just wanted to say that developing an Emacs package outside Emacs bears additional burden. It is up to you to decide whether that burden is justified. _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
