Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2007-02-04) writes: > >>> Okay, that proposal does not seem to be too popular. How about >>> adding something like the above sentence in capital letters to the >>> start of the blurb inserted into the mail buffer by >>> `TeX-submit-bug-report' then? >> >> How about the following: we (upstream) put in a blurb recommending to >> check out the newest release version and date from our website to make >> sure that the report is not for too old a version. > > Unless `TeX-submit-bug-report' actually establishes a connection > with our web site for checking which version and date is current, > this does not seem to make much sense. At least not for our own > distribution.
I don't see why not. I was not proposing putting the current versions into the report, but rather the web site address where the user could check himself. >> We also check (in the case of an XEmacs package) the author version >> and mention it prominently in the report so that people actually >> have a chance to see what version they carry. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "author version". If you mean the > installed version, its version number and date are already included > in the report. The version number even is in the title. It just happens to be the downstream version number and date. Unless this has been fixed by now. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
