* Reiner Steib (2007-06-07) writes: > On Thu, Jun 07 2007, Ralf Angeli wrote: > >> [...] if other stuff was already installed into site-lisp [...] > > BTW: Did you check how the compiled Emacs handles site-lisp? Are any > site-lisp directories present in `load-path' when using emacs -Q?
Yes. > Does AUCTeX's configure handle it correctly? > (cf. <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and > <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) I just unpacked the ZIP archive provided on ftp.gnu.org and it contained a site-lisp directory with a subdirs.el file. Configuring, building, and installing AUCTeX with that Emacs distribution went fine. >> So perhaps we should continue to provide the bundle for users mainly >> interested in using Emacs as an editor for TeX and related languages. I >> think we should not compete with the binaries provided on ftp.gnu.org, >> so I'd continue to offer selected CVS versions. > > If your target are users who want Emacs as an editor for *TeX, I'd > suggest to offer Emacs 22 (either the releases 22.1, 22.2, ... or > selected/occasional version from the EMACS_22_BASE branch) plus the > current AUCTeX release. I expect that the Emacs will become less > stable than in the past and thus not very suitable for these users, > IMHO. I'd agree with that but as mentioned before, providing Emacs 22 is -- except for the convenience of having AUCTeX and image libraries included -- somewhat pointless if there is already an official download. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
