Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Reiner Steib (2008-02-04) writes: > >> I don't even have a current AUCTeX installation for XEmacs available. > > > Same here. And since we haven't heard for a long time from > > Miguel it probably wouldn't be the worst idea to replace > > toolbar-x with a simple Emacs-only implemenation of the LaTeX > > tool bar if we want to make some progress. > > I don't understand. On the auctex webpage you even provide the latest > auctex version as a xemacs pkg.
What is there not to understand? XEmacs has for a very long time not provided up to date AUCTeX packages. So it has been up to us. If we can't hope to get reasonable support and/or documentation for the state of toolbar-x and no developer understanding it is available, the only course forward might be to replace it. And this is not going to happen magically on all platforms at once. > Now I see two possibilities > > - try to get the thing to work under Xemacs. Unfortunately I can > only volunteer to test but not to hack. Who of the basically Emacs-centric developers should try to get an experimental toolbar to work under XEmacs? We really have more than enough work at our hands for the supported stuff. > - if this is not possible because of the lack of developers, then > one could try to get the old latex-toolbar which is around > since 2001 and works only for Xemacs, to work again with the > new auctex version. Feel free to do so, but that certainly is not within the scope of the AUCTeX project. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
