>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > * Reiner Steib (2008-02-04) writes: >> >> I don't even have a current AUCTeX installation for XEmacs available. >> >> >> I don't understand. On the auctex webpage you even provide the latest >> auctex version as a xemacs pkg. > What is there not to understand? XEmacs has for a very long time not > provided up to date AUCTeX packages. So it has been up to us. I know, and I found it always *very generous* from your side to do so. What I meant I don't understand was the fact that Ralf said he does not have a current AUCTEX installation for Xemacs available, well he does it is on your webpage thanks to your own effort. >> >> - try to get the thing to work under Xemacs. Unfortunately I can >> only volunteer to test but not to hack. > Who of the basically Emacs-centric developers should try to get > an experimental toolbar to work under XEmacs? We really have > more than enough work at our hands for the supported stuff. I will try to contact Miguel then in order to understand the issue better and to ask on xemacs beta, then. Maybe someone with a understanding on the toolbar-x might get interested. >> - if this is not possible because of the lack of developers, then >> one could try to get the old latex-toolbar which is around since >> 2001 and works only for Xemacs, to work again with the new >> auctex version. > Feel free to do so, but that certainly is not within the scope of > the AUCTeX project. If it worked and if you obtained the copyright assignment of the author, would that be a reason to include it?
pgpOfcmiJu3UA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
