Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: >> Well, what's missing is that the region file needs to be updated >> before doing that but I don't have time to do that. > > Uhm, I'll try to have a look at this, but I don't know when.
I think we should extract the `TeX-region-create' call in `TeX-command-region' into a separate function `TeX-update-region-file' (oh, another update). This could then be used by `TeX-command-region', `LaTeX-command-section', and their TeX-update counterparts. >> Too bad the bindings for the only two better terms I can come up, >> i.e., _c_ompile and _r_ecompile, are already taken for _c_ommand and >> _r_egion... > > Indeed we're running out of letters. Letters still free should be: > > a (u) x y > > Actually I'm not sure about "x". Hm, indeed. When typing `C-c C-x' emacs seems to wait for another key, but `C-c C-x <f1>' says that there are not keys defined with that prefix. Looks like that bindings points to some empty keymap? > Do you have ideas for "a" or "y"? I like Ivan's suggestions. Basically, the command is something like "make all", so how about either `TeX-make-all', `TeX-execute-all', `TeX-command-all', or `TeX-compile-all'? The binding C-c C-a would make sense for all of them. I'm not sure which name is best, though. `TeX-command-all' has the nice property that then all processing commands have the TeX-command prefix. So maybe `TeX-command-compile-all' would be best compromise wrt. discoverability, descriptiveness, and mnemonics. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
